Tuesday, 27 October 2009

Post 10.

Am I not permitted to receive a fine or probation order without first speaking about things that are banned under that Act?

Things that even the media cannot speak about? Things that politicians have refused to utter incase they say something inadvertently? Things that I do not want to remember?

I don't want to inform the Magistrate as to why someone has a guilty conscience about something. If they do not fine me or give me a probation order, or jail me, on the 24th November when I stand before them again, then I am changing my plea to not guilty.

Then I'll say again that "I have no memory of the incident" so you have to prove it. Prove it with the cctv at the rail station, with the witnesses who are too scared to appear there, with the dna, with the blood, and with the fingerprints.

Perhaps I am incorrect in thinking that a guilty plea would be good for my cv. Perhaps a conviction would best. Or better still an acquittal.

I told my solicitor that, as was the case the first time, "we will make the cid unit drop the charges".

Concerning this thread on a pink paper, I'm not going with you. You're going to get hurt. I'll fucking kill you.

No comments: