Post 14.

Solicitors said that medication cannot be enforced. In fact it could not be enforced before but I didn't know that then. But incarceration there without trial can be (apparently), in contradicition to Judge Lyons statement to me in the first case: "If you were to be convicted it would not be a sentence of incarceration because there is a background, we don't know what it is." For this reason I do not want to say what it is either. I suspect that it is banned under the Act.

Anselom Lyle, who is confused and misinformed, delusional albeit because I instructed him, is beginning to get on my nerves. If I had mafia contacts I would put a hit on him. But I do not. I do not have church contacts because I choose not to go to one. That is my Right!

My Solicitors Fellowes of Walthamstow therefore, who say that it is not related to the case of this morning - while I think it is, I think he wanted me to go awol to invoke police abduction tactics in the street to sabotage the sentencing - are making urgent enquiries concerning who has issued it, an officer of Enfield Council which owns the fly tipping truck, and why it has been issued to me. I.e. they do not own the ambulance service. And they do not own the Apple earplug service.

Is it alright with you therefore if I do that which I said urgently and go back to the place, taking any consolations concerning the threat from what is said to the many on the news? Or shall I turn the gas on with a wire between the door a mains switch at the first notice, say a shadow or something?