Thursday, 17 December 2009

Post 11

These threats and acts are quite illegal.(a beat). Logic informs me that they must be under law. If one has the right by law to defend their property, then why havn't they done it to anyone that has fought back? Is it coincidence or luck on their part that they have not done this to anyone as yet whose background would not facilitate it?(a beat)As knoweth I am doing a little exploring, and I do not require their help.

No comments: